Original Letters · D80

Hypothesis as discipline, not final belief

Crawler-readable record detail page for AI tools and search engines.

This snapshot preserves OON summary text, available language/source links, and related records. The visual React interface remains unchanged.

Record summary

  • Reference: D80
  • Kind: Original Letters
  • Period: 1969
  • Date/source detail: 17/11/1969
  • Reading path: Discernment and transmission
  • Available languages: English + French + Spanish + German
  • D80 presents the source's gnoseology: empirical inquiry, awareness that perception and thought distort reality, and hypotheses used as mental discipline rather than final belief.

External source links

Translation source links

English translation

  • Status: AI-assisted English translation
  • AI-assisted English translation. AI can make mistakes, especially with technical terms, names, or source-specific vocabulary. Verify important passages against the linked source archives.
  • Source language: French
  • Last updated: 2026-06-23
  • Heading: D80 | T0-91/92
  • Heading: OUR GNOSEOLOGY.
  • We have not elaborated a theory of knowledge that is separated from our own WOALA OLEASS (Philosophy-Theology) and with its own identity.
  • Our source of knowledge is empirical. Convinced that the AAIODI (the real entity) is unknown to us, convinced that the WAAM accessible through our intellectual and sensory pathways is a "phantom" created by our I-THINKING, we opt to at least attempt to penetrate this image deformed by us of the AAIODI. (On UMMO, there exists an ancient legend that illustrates this attitude):
  • The IGOONOOI (hurricane laden with abrasive sands, dangerous, which manages to destroy vegetation and to strongly erode rocks) wanted one day to read the OUDEXIENOO (see note 6) of the OEMMI "of the lakes", because he felt "weak and sick" (his speed was dropping according to the original text).
  • NOTE 6: The OUDEXIONOO were monoliths of porous and soft rock in the shape of wands that were erected in the fields and where our ancestors made inscriptions relating to "therapeutic recipes or advice". They wanted to perpetuate thus a medicine of an empirico-magical character. We still conserve some of these long columns.
  • That night, he descended from the "deserts" and blew as a hurricane terrorizing the OEMMII, destroying the BAAYIODOVII (flora and animals) and filing down the rocks and the earth. But when the break of day arrived and he wanted to read the inscriptions, these had been eroded by the dust in movement (deforming the texts) and thus the IGOONOOI died (he stopped "blowing") by badly interpreting the graphics that he himself had half destroyed.
  • This myth can illustrate the drama of the OEMMII of UMMO. Conscious that the WAAM that we "contemplate", that we "think" is not the true WAAM engendered by WOA, since the "thinking" function distorts, deforms its reality, the human being, and by extension any EESEOEMII (THINKING ENTITY), is condemned to erase the true healing inscription that would satisfy his gnoseological anguish.
  • Our ancestors progressively discovered that the scientific formulations elaborated under premises and under conclusions based on a simplistic logic did not have the apodictic character that they attributed to them at the start. In the dynamics of the WAAM existed principles incapable of being envisaged under the qualifications that you call "FALSE" or "TRUE". Thus surge voices demanding a new logic capable not only of surpassing the limits of certain rudimentary forms of informative communication, but also of enriching the range of possible AIGAEGAA (propositions). Otherwise how to attach to the scientific phenomenology realities like AMMIOXOO (MORAL EVIL), IUAMMIO DII (CRUELTY), YIISA-OO (HAPPINESS, MORAL GOOD, INTIMATE SATISFACTION), OANEEAOIYOOYO (Telepathic transmission), OENBUUAU (SOMA-PSYCHE link). All these terms cannot be measured analytically and inserted into the framework of objective reality with concepts such as GOODAA (liquid state of matter), IBOSOO UU (see the paragraph devoted to the structure of the WAAM) or IBON-EE (radiations of very high frequency).
  • It was necessary to liberate the OEMMII who devotes himself to science from his unconscious tendency to impregnate his conclusions with affective tints, thus perverting the consciousness of objective reality.
  • Thus surged new techniques to access phenomena that you would qualify as "SPIRITUAL" by using a rigorously scientific methodology (in the sense that you accord to this word, that is to say by verifying the facts and by analytically formulating their laws). There is only one difference with the scientists of EARTH: You, you accept a hypothesis by elevating it to the level of rational explanation when its postulates (enunciated under Aristotelian forms) do not contradict the law expressed mathematically - generally of statistical type - until the discovery of new facts enters into conflict with the old formulation.
  • Our "agnosticism" (as you yourselves call it) pushes us not only to abstain from defining and from probing something as transcendent as WOA or AAIOODI, but also pushes us to elaborate a theory and to verify it. WE DO NOT ACCEPT its authenticity despite everything.
  • This flood of concepts, explanations, hypotheses, serves us as a mental gymnastics to constantly purify ideas. When a thinker of UMMO formulates for example a new hypothesis concerning the influence of the UWAAM (twin cosmos) ratified by the facts and by its analytical formulation, HE HIMSELF DOES NOT BELIEVE IT and never accepts it. The proper dynamics of the thinking function is more important than the "flat" stage of a stagnant theory that engenders a school, as among you. An example, although absurd, will illustrate what I am saying. If Freud had had our mentality of UMMOENMII, he would never have dogmatically accepted his own theory of the "oedipus complex".
  • This pragmatic conduct, strange for you, is useful to us because it avoids as much the atomization of schools that divide the Social Network by provoking conflictual situations, as the narcissistic and non-objective postures of the one who accepts his own mental geneses as ultimate truths, forgetting that another oemmi of the future, more intelligent and expert, will perfect again, without denying them, the preceding propositions. This is why our oemii thinkers do not attempt to speculate around the essence of what is inaccessible (for example WOA and the AAIODI).

Source and archive notes

  • Translator Note: d'après le dictionnaire ROBERT, apodictique signifie "qui a une évidence de droit et non pas seulement de fait"
  • Translator Note: le mot d'originge est "voces" : voix ou termes

Terminology notes

  • "apodictic": Kept in English to mean incontestable, logically certain.

Translation risk notes

  • "teintes affectives": Translated literally to "affective tints", referring to emotional bias.

Terms preserved in source language

  • WOALA OLEASS
  • AAIODI
  • WAAM
  • UMMO
  • IGOONOOI
  • OUDEXIENOO
  • OEMMI
  • OEMMII
  • BAAYIODOVII
  • WOA
  • EESEOEMII
  • AIGAEGAA
  • AMMIOXOO
  • IUAMMIO DII
  • YIISA-OO
  • OANEEAOIYOOYO
  • OENBUUAU
  • GOODAA
  • IBOSOO UU
  • IBON-EE
  • AAIOODI
  • UWAAM
  • UMMOENMII
  • oemmi
  • oemii

Suggested UMMOwiki concepts

  • UMMO scientific method / empirical hypotheses
  • Multivalent logic vs Aristotelian logic

Related UMMOwiki references

Related records