Original Letters · D59-4

IBOZOO UU caveats and subparticles

Crawler-readable record detail page for AI tools and search engines.

This snapshot preserves OON summary text, available language/source links, and related records. The visual React interface remains unchanged.

Record summary

  • Reference: D59-4
  • Kind: Original Letters
  • Period: 1967
  • Date/source detail: 28/11/1967
  • Reading path: Reality, IBOZO, WAAM, and cosmology
  • Available languages: English + French + Spanish + German
  • D59-4 summarizes earlier explanations while warning that diagrams and simplified images can mislead. It is useful because the source distinguishes describing a theory from demonstrating it.
  • Note: Ummo-Sciences notes that this letter may be missing pages.

External source links

Translation source links

English translation

  • Status: AI-assisted English translation
  • AI-assisted English translation. AI can make mistakes, especially with technical terms, names, or source-specific vocabulary. Verify important passages against the linked source archives.
  • Source language: French
  • Last updated: 2026-06-23
  • Heading: UMMOAELEWEE
  • Language SPANISH
  • Number of copies 1
  • Heading: ENRIQUE VILLAGRASA NOVOA
  • Madrid (Spain)
  • Heading: PRELIMINARY SUMMARY
  • In our previous reports we have exposed, in the most didactic form that was possible for us, the basic concept of the IBOZOO UU.
  • It is not very easy to find visible images of elements or factors (which it does not seem correct to us to call them particles) that can only be conceived analytically with the help of mathematical algorithms.
  • But we repeat to you that certain pedagogical licenses run a very grave risk. Thus when to a UUGEEYIE (little boy or little girl) of OYAAAGAA, his professors pretend to represent the atom as a miniature "Planetary model", inciting them to represent the Nucleus as a sort of "Sun" and the orbital electrons as "planetoids" turning around it, the UUGEEYIE assimilates an erroneous concept that he will keep internalized thus for his whole life preventing him from conceiving his Physical Cosmos in a more suitable manner, if he does not manage to surpass it through later advanced studies.
  • We suggest these paragraphs to you to warn you against easy and erroneous prejudices. We consider it very important that the concept of OAWOO ("AXIS" or ORIENTED DIMENSION) not be identified by you as the materialization of a straight line. Nor even as a rotary or axial vector representing oriented magnitudes. The OAWOO is not measurable, that is to say that it is not a magnitude, it has no dimensions such as the Physicists of OYAAGAA (PLANET EARTH) conceive them; for this we suggest that you do not attempt to identify it with the "LENGTH dimension".
  • Without a doubt, a layman in Mathematics would try, upon knowing our theory, to seek a naive PERCEPTIBLE representation of such an "AXIS", but we know that such a mental representation is impossible for you at the present time and this pushes us to represent the drawings of the document with the aid of spherical and axial representations which are as puerile as the concept of the Atom explained by some humble professors of elementary education.
  • The OAWOO, on the other hand, IS NOT A CONVENTION: it is not a simple parameter, an arbitrary manner of representing an IBOZOO UU (such as, for example, the Lepton Number invented by the Physicists of Earth can be).
  • The OAWOO does not exist without imagining it linked or "connected" to another OAWOO with which it forms an ELEMENTARY ANGLE that we call IOA WOO.
  • All the confusion, that we can provoke by trying by all means to present these concepts of our Physics to you, is provoked precisely by our desire to give you these references in a didactic and comprehensible manner. The apparent contradictions are then inevitable, as it would happen if to the question of one of the terrestrial children asking how a Transistor receiver can pick up a distant broadcast, you answered: "the words come through the air".
  • It is indubitable that this candid response adapted to the primary mentality of the child will entail a series of contradictions with the formulation of certain postulates of the Physical Theory of Fields and of Fluid Mechanics.
  • In fact, it will be much more accessible to imagine the concept of IOAWOO (we will translate by "ANGLE FORMED BY TWO OAWOO"). You will remember from the previous documents and how we identified this IOAWOO with certain magnitudes that are familiar to you (LENGTH and TIME).
  • Despite everything, it will not be too easy to conceive an ANGLE, NOT formed by straight lines or planes that intersect. Such a conception of an Angle differs from the convention so familiar to terrestrial mathematicians.
  • In summary: if you try to apply your own mental schemas implied by the orthodoxy of formal logic, although we bring you the entire scientific formalism of our Theory, it will be impossible for you to assimilate these concepts. This is the obvious reason why, in our exposition, we try to facilitate the comprehension of IBOZOO UU through gross comparisons.
  • All of this on the other hand seems to repulse reason. The uneducated OEMII has accustomed himself to contemplate objects limited by lines, to mentally materialize angles limited by straight lines and planes and to locate objects at such point or such place.
  • It will take much effort for this OEMII to imagine an IBOZOO UU that cannot be defined by the three coordinates that define the point in a Euclidean space. You will then see that it will be very difficult moreover to imagine that this has no mass and that one cannot assign a quantity of movement to it, that it has no energy in it, nor electric charge, since such concepts (MASS, ENERGY and CHARGE) are mental elaborations associated with a particular orientation of such elements. Such an "ENTITY", an expert in logic of OYAAGAA would define it perhaps as the non-A (Ā) of divalent Logic (that is to say as THAT WHICH DOES NOT EXIST).
  • But, the IBOZOO UU is not a simple mathematical postulate, an entelechy composed by bizarre concepts of "axes" (which ultimately are not AXES) with the help of which one exposes a new Hypothesis of Physico-cosmological Conception.
  • On the contrary, we have empirically confirmed the validity of this conception. We know that the IBOZOO UU REALLY EXISTS, and we only recognize that being ignorant of the other aspects of such entities we are far from reaching half of the COSMOLOGICAL TRUTH. And perhaps we will never reach it, although we tend asymptotically towards it.
  • We are not trying to make you accept, you Mr. Villagrasa and your known brothers, this new conception unknown to the Physicists of OYAAGAA (EARTH). For this, it would be necessary that we expose our logical principles to you beforehand and that we accompany this disclosure (since no other character can sustain this information) not only with the mathematical formulation that would prove it but also with access to certain empirical proofs that would contribute to making it admitted.
  • It would be puerile to pretend that a Physicist of Earth could accept these premises through a purely popularizing and didactic text without a coherent argumentative baggage and, at the very least, the support of a trustworthy testimony.
  • Never would OEMII (MEN), who hide themselves and who work in the shadows for reasons that we have already explained to you on multiple occasions, be able to pretend to be believed thanks to mysterious telephone conversations or by means of unsigned typewritten documents identifiable.
  • We are trying, in short, to DESCRIBE a THEORY to you, not to DEMONSTRATE it to you.
  • You, Mr. Villagrasa, can very justly object to us: that it would be worthwhile to append mathematical arguments to our documents that would exhaust the debate, remove the doubt. Our attitude of refusing to cooperate, does it have the goal of avoiding our identity being revealed clearly, or is it the fruit of a deception or the consequence of an egoistic attitude tending to monopolize our science and our technology so as not to transfer it to the cultural acquisition of PLANET EARTH (OYAAGAA)?
  • As you already know the preceding arguments in this sense, there will iteratively result from it this suspicion of polemic; but we remind you that you too always seem to fall iteratively into a basic prejudice. You suffer in these invocations from a vice of origin which is to CONSIDER THAT OUR CONTACT WITH YOU HAS AS AN OBJECT THAT YOU AND THE OTHER OEMII OF THIS PLANET ACCEPT OUR IDENTITY.
  • It is clear that, if such were our pretense, there exist many means to unveil ourselves and naturally, it would not necessarily be you, the meager two hundred scientists and some brothers of varied professions to whom we write, the suitable targets to make ourselves known. We do not even think for a moment that the State Administrations of the different countries of this planet would have to cause us any embarrassment or damage.
  • As for the apparent egoism that we could reveal by reserving our science and technique, we regret postponing the response to your light appreciation until later. WE KNOW that a contribution of this nature would gravely perturb the Social Network. You, Mr. Villagrasa, consult an authentic expert in Sociology, one of your brothers and surely, if he is objective and intelligent, he will bring explanations converging in this sense.
  • Heading: THE ELEMENTARY SUBPARTICLES
  • If we want to describe our conceptions of MASS and ENERGY to you we must establish at each instant the possible differences and resemblances between the current ideas of a PHYSICIST of Planet UMMO and another of OYAAGAA (PLANET EARTH).
  • First of all, we indicate to you that except for certain differences concerning the true meaning of factors that are familiar to you (like SPIN), we accept as valid numerous terrestrial discoveries, although we interpret them in a different manner.
  • To illustrate the preceding paragraph let us see a few concrete examples of conditioned coincidences.
  • ● You have measured the Mass of the PROTON, of the ELECTRON, of numerous MESONS and HYPERONS or you have noted the null MASS of the NEUTRINO or the PHOTON.
  • ● We corroborate the existence of what you call PARTICLES, and we confirm that the measurement of their rest mass relative, realized by you, is correct. Our difference appears at the moment of interpreting the true nature of these supposed particles (we will be more explicit afterwards).
  • Let us now see an example of difference regarding the evaluation of the CONCEPT.
  • ● You know an important parameter that you call SPIN or INTRINSIC MOMENT and you "know" that it is quantized by five measurements. (Some Physicists of Earth have interpreted this SPIN as ROTATION of the PARTICLE assigning to it a MOMENT for its value).
  • ● On the other hand, we know that such a ROTATION DOES NOT EXIST, and that the quantization of its value is an error, because if in a three-dimensional framework the Number of values is finite, the possible orientations of the quaternion of OAWOO that you interpret as SPIN, can never be measured as discrete but as what you would call a CONTINUOUS magnitude.
  • Finally, we point out to you another Hypothesis in force among you that we have rejected as entirely false. ● Certain physicists of Earth currently conceive the PROTON as being formed of MESONS.
  • ● To follow this equivocal pathway can retard Terrestrial Research in the domain of Physics for many years. The primitive hypothesis that consisted in conceiving the PROTON as an indivisible particle is closer to reality.
  • Up to present, this concerns a small random sample of some of the differences that we have recorded.
  • Heading: A COMPARISON FOR PEOPLE POORLY VERSED IN PHYSICS
  • Throughout these last years, the Physicists of OYAGAA have progressively pierced the intimate nature of matter. Little by little you have obtained a catalog of a series of particles to which you have assigned a series of parameters whose measurement is possible with the help of your current Laboratory instruments.
  • Thus, as we indicated previously, you are capable of measuring the MASS at rest or in movement, its instantaneous energy, its electric charge, its SPIN and its ORBITAL MOMENT. You do not know the situation of a particle at a given instant but the only probability of localizing it at a defined point.
  • However numerous physicists suppose that a particle has a reality, either as a concentrated phenomenon in a limited radius environment, or as a discrete quantity or Quantum of ENERGY without being able to define its size and position). However without the existence of INTERACTIONS and before the possible collision with another particle, this one can move in a trajectory that you can visualize (in a cloud chamber for example) conserving in the meantime its initial attributes of MASS, SPIN, ORBITAL, CHARGE and ENERGY.
  • Before continuing, we are going to give you two didactic comparisons.
  • You employ for your popular festivals a string of rockets linked by a continuous fuse (in Spain you call this firework, a STRING of firecrackers).
  • Imagine that an observer contemplates from very far away a street on which one of these strings has been extended.
  • When the explosion of the first firecracker of this string begins, an OEMII runs carrying a Bengal fire in the parallel direction to the string. The firecrackers of the string exploding one after the other and very quickly, can provoke the optical illusion for our observer who sees this phenomenon from afar that it is a "LIGHT" that "runs" along the rope.
  • He will think he sees two LIGHTS that move with parallel trajectories:
  • / (the runner with his Bengal fire)
  • / (the sequential firing of the firecrackers of the string)
  • He will perhaps not see the difference and even he could believe that it concerns two runners with Bengal fires.
  • You see therefore the difference between these two PHYSICAL conceptions. The PHYSICISTS of OYAGAA would accept the "version of the runner with his Bengal fire". The Physicists of our PLANET know that the displacement of particles can be assimilated to the metaphor of the STRING OF FIRECRACKERS.
  • If a fragment of radioactive mineral emits β (Beta) rays, you believe that the electron that departed from a grain of the substance is the same one that, after a few centimeters, provokes a collision with for example a molecule of oxygen.
  • Our conception differs enormously from this formal image. THE ELECTRON IN ITSELF DOES NOT EXIST (just as one cannot say with certainty that a FLASH or a TWINKLE exists in the firecracker). Yes, there exists a chain of IBOZOO UU inaccessible to our senses or to our measuring instruments because of the particular orientation of their OAWOO ("AXES"): as, for the eyes of a distant observer, the cardboard cartridges filled with potassium nitrate and antimony sulfide, drowned in the night, would be inaccessible.
  • Moreover certain OAWOO of each of the components of this series or chain orient themselves consecutively. (To then return afterwards to their primitive orientation).
  • This constitutes the illusion of movement of something that is underlying to our external sense organs and which escapes the control of your current measuring instruments.
  • It is not possible to conceive an isolated PARTICLE outside the WAAM (COSMOS) as it would be unimaginable to conceive a WAVE of the Ocean which is not associated with Water.
  • Not only is Energy quantized (on this subject terrestrial physicists are not mistaken) but the MAGNITUDE "DISTANCE" is also. It is not possible to distinguish a "sensible quantity" of dimension inferior to 10^-13 centimeters (angular relationship between two "CONNECTED" (LINKED) IBOZOO UU. Precisely a SUBATOMIC PARTICLE has as a base an IBOZOO UU and another CONNECTED (We employ the word "CONNECTED" because we do not find another more adapted in your language. We believe that the word "ADJACENT" would suggest a localization of the IBOZOO UU and we have already told you that an IBOZOO UU exists but cannot be POSITIONED).
  • We are going to try to represent an AYUU (NETWORK) of IBOZOO UU in an ideal plane in such a way that no IBOZOO UU orients one of its OAWOO ("AXES") which compose it perpendicularly to the fictive Plane that we have drawn with colored pencils.
  • We say that is "connected" with (DUU OII) and that is DUU OII (connected) with. An OEMII will consider this network "EMPTY" and will identify it illusorily with NOTHING. For him there will exist no MATTER, nor GRAVITATIONAL or ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD, nor WEAK INTERACTIONS, nor NUCLEAR INTERACTIONS. In short he will extrapolate this AYUU from the COSMOS that he knows.
  • But imagine that the IBOZOO UU represented in ORANGE orients one of its OAWOO that we call OAWOOYEY in an angle that we idealize with α = ( π/6 ) radians.
  • Heading: Source figures
  • Image: D59-4-imgA source image. /assets/source-images/D59-4/D59-4-imgA.jpg
  • Image: D59-4-img31 source image. /assets/source-images/D59-4/D59-4-img31.jpg
  • Image: D59-4-img32 source image. /assets/source-images/D59-4/D59-4-img32.jpg
  • Image: D59-4-ideo1 source image. /assets/source-images/D59-4/D59-4-ideo1.jpg
  • Image: D59-4-ideo2 source image. /assets/source-images/D59-4/D59-4-ideo2.jpg
  • Image: D59-4-ideo2bis source image. /assets/source-images/D59-4/D59-4-ideo2bis.jpg
  • Image: D59-4-ideo3 source image. /assets/source-images/D59-4/D59-4-ideo3.jpg

Source and archive notes

  • Archivist/Translator Note: Note that IOAWOO is underlined with a gradient from yellow to red, which undoubtedly references the yellow and red of the drawing. On the drawing the yellow corresponds to the angle, that is to say to the prefix "I" whereas the red corresponds to the two axes, that is to say to "OAWOO".
  • Archivist/Translator Note: The A is highlighted by a stroke over it. In Set Theory, the macron is used to indicate negation.
  • Typist/Archivist Note: The typist forgot an A after the Y and added it between the Y and A. There are indeed two times two As.
  • Translator/Archivist Note: NO, of quarks ! the meson is a binding particle.
  • Archivist Note: Image 33 is missing in the documents we have available. Moreover, this document, stops abruptly suggesting that there may be a continuation that has been lost, if we believe the Farriols references...
  • Source images from Ummo-Sciences are rendered in the translation page where mapped. Raw image placeholders are hidden from the public reader.

Terminology notes

  • UUGEEYIE: Little boy or little girl.
  • AYUU: Network.
  • DUU OII: Connected.
  • OAWOOYEY: Specific UMMO term for an oriented OAWOO.

Translation risk notes

  • The French comment "NON, de quarks ! le méson est une particule de liaison." was kept as an archivist/translator note instead of in the primary translation.

Terms preserved in source language

  • UMMOAELEWEE
  • IBOZOO UU
  • UUGEEYIE
  • OYAAAGAA
  • OAWOO
  • IOAWOO
  • OEMII
  • OYAAGAA
  • WAAM
  • AYUU
  • DUU OII
  • OAWOOYEY

Suggested UMMOwiki concepts

  • IBOZOO UU linked network visualization
  • String of firecrackers metaphor for electron movement

Related UMMOwiki references

Related records