Original Letters · D79

WOA and the nature of the multiverse

Crawler-readable record detail page for AI tools and search engines.

This snapshot preserves OON summary text, available language/source links, and related records. The visual React interface remains unchanged.

Record summary

  • Reference: D79
  • Kind: Original Letters
  • Period: 1969
  • Date/source detail: 17/11/1969
  • Reading path: WOA, UMMOWOA, and Jesus
  • Available languages: English + French + Spanish + German
  • The Ummo present WOA as the fundamental generating principle of the multiverse (WAAM-WAAM), while describing the limitations of human language and mental structures in attempting to conceptualize this entity.

External source links

Translation source links

English translation

  • Status: AI-assisted English translation
  • AI-assisted English translation. AI can make mistakes, especially with technical terms, names, or source-specific vocabulary. Verify important passages against the linked source archives.
  • Source language: French
  • Last updated: 2026-06-23
  • Heading: D79 | T0-88
  • Heading: OUR IDEA OF WOA.
  • It is truly difficult to speak of WOA of which we are ignorant of the essence, while being forced to employ a foreign language whose logical bases are bivalent. On UMMO, when we employ the phonetic expression AIOOYA AMIIE (whose literal transcription would be "DOES NOT EXIST") we refer indeed to abstract concepts or to ideas or else to WOA. We seek to express something different from AIOODI (INACCESSIBLE BEING) since AIOODI presents itself to us with "dimensions" and WOA is ADIMENSIONAL, that is to say, that it is not susceptible of being deformed by our thought. Thus we say AIOOYA IBONEE (cosmic radiations exist) or AA-INNUO-AIOOYA-AMIE (symmetry does not exist).
  • WOA is adimensional. On this point we are in agreement with the theologians of EARTH. It makes no sense to speak of "Eternity", of time, of thought or of spirit in the essence of WOA.
  • Moreover its reason of AIOOYA AMIIE is precisely that of being genesis of the idea of AIOODI. We have told you that AIIOODI is the Entity that does not transcend us since it is extorted, fractionated into multiple forms (WAAMWAAM).
  • It is in this sense that we can (under our familiar angle) imagine that in WOA "there is" a creator spirit of ideas, of an infinity of ideas, insofar as these ideas are not incompatible with the essence of the WAAM.
  • Moreover we do not attribute qualities to WOA, or we do not associate with its AIOBII hominoid functions that anthropomorphize its concept as the theologians of EARTH have unfortunately done in past epochs. The attribute of GOODNESS, of CREATOR, of JUST, of CRUEL and others, have no meaning if they are attached to "that which AIOBII" (This is the case of WOA).
  • When we translate the phoneme IIWOAE by the Spanish word "to generate" we prostitute the authentic meaning, given that our concept of IIWOAE IS NOT synonymous with "TO ENGENDER" or "to CREATE" in the sense that you hear it, that is to say "the function that allows an Entity with a prior existence to make surge a CONTINGENT BEING whose constitutive elements did not pre-exist".
  • We perfectly realize the confusion that can bother you to try to understand these paragraphs. It is not our fault.
  • By using your familiar logic, we will symbolize this concept:
  • Seen from the perspective of man, WOA (God) "creates" the bases of atoms, generates the laws that govern the Cosmos, but for the perspective of WOA, the function "to generate", "to create", and even "TO COEXIST", has no meaning.
  • It is necessary to insist on the great difference that we observe between our concept of genesis by WOA (seen by an OEMMI) and this concept of generation such as it would be apprehended if we situated ourselves (absurd possibility) from the "point of view" of WOA.
  • For us, WOA engenders an infinity of ideas, ideas which as excrescences of a "SUPREME BEING", must REALIZE THEMSELVES, EXIST OUTSIDE OR INSIDE OF US. Thus it is capable of engendering as many cosmos as we can imagine thinking entities.
  • But under the hypothetical angle of WOA, everything is different. It (coexists-engenders) with the (using a quantitative qualifier makes no sense) AIOODI, but a thinking being is simultaneously AIOODI because, in its turn, by thinking in "it", it deforms it into a thousand ontological facets, generating its own WAAM, its own COSMOS. Thus surge as many WAAM as EESEOEMI compatible with "the spirit of WOA".
  • For WOA the pluri-cosmos (WAAM-WAAM) will therefore have no meaning but it will not be the same for us, thinking men.
  • But let us continue with our process "seen" by me (I-THINKING).
  • WOA, among the infinity of ideas that coexist with its essence, imagines that of an adimensional "BEING" capable of wronging its own AAIODI (that is to say: to think, to engender ideas). Such a "BEING" (BEING for my concept; AAIODI for WOA) must therefore be free. (Observe that if it were not, its genesis of ideas would have no meaning since these would be attributable to WOA and would therefore not be IDEAS (in the conceptual sense that you attribute to such a word) but AAIODI.
  • It is not logical either to imagine that this free "BEING" and generating another AAIODI, could be a double of WOA. (WOA will not be able to engender such a BEING).
  • It is thus "that was generated" BUAWE BIAEI (can be translated by "COMMUNITARIAN or SOCIAL SPIRIT") which represents, as we will explain further on, the collectivity of EESEOEMII (thinking beings) incapable of penetrating the essence of the AIODI, since their attempt provokes a "mutation" in it, as we have explained to you previously.
  • How many BUAWE BIAEI "exist"? That is to say how many categories of thinking groups are there? Are all BUAWE BIAEI identical in their essence? Is the terrestrial BUAWE BIAEI the same as that of UMMO?
  • We will try to answer all these questions in order, but first it is necessary to clarify the double interpretation that the phoneme BUAWE BIAEI represents for us: a first acceptation (the ancient one) is synonymous with "COLLECTIVITY of EESEOMI". The second represents our current concept of "COLLECTIVE SPIRIT". Without this clarification we could arrive at a deception of an amphibological character which would render the understanding of our thought even more difficult.
  • If we stick to the first acceptation, it is evident that we ignore by empirical means how many categories of CONSCIOUS AND THINKING beings can exist in the WAAM-WAAM (set of Universes coexisting with WOA).
  • If we accept the definition of the WAAM-WAAM in the strict sense, there must be as many WAAM as categories of thinking beings capable of deforming the AAIODI.
  • By also adopting the word BUAWE BIAEII as a synonym of homogeneous collectivity, you the men of EARTH, we the OEMII of UMMO and ALL the humans who have our neurocortical structure and whose mental processes unfold under analogous bases, we belong to it; but by suggesting the other meaning (collective soul) we confess to you that we have not yet been able to resolve this enigma. (One of the reasons, among others, for our coming to your OYAA relies on the realization of a profound study of the problem).

Source and archive notes

  • Archivist Note: (voir note 10) cette note est manquante
  • Archivist Note: (voir note 11) . cette note est manquante
  • Translator Note: le mot d'origine est "extorsionar"
  • Translator Note: d'après le dictionnaire ROBERT, amphibologie signifie "double sens présenté par une proposition"

Terminology notes

  • "amphibological": Kept in English to mirror the French/Spanish term indicating a statement with double meaning.

Translation risk notes

  • "léser" (wronging/harming/extorting): The translator noted the Spanish original was "extorsionar", which translates best to extorting or violently taking, but "léser" (wronging/injuring) is the French choice in the text. I used "wronging" to bridge the meaning of deforming/forcing a change on reality.

Terms preserved in source language

  • WOA
  • UMMO
  • AIOOYA AMIIE
  • AIOODI
  • ADIMENSIONAL
  • AIOOYA IBONEE
  • AA-INNUO-AIOOYA-AMIE
  • WAAMWAAM
  • WAAM
  • AIOBII
  • IIWOAE
  • OEMMI
  • EESEOEMI
  • AAIODI
  • BUAWE BIAEI
  • EESEOEMII
  • EESEOMI
  • OEMII
  • OYAA

Suggested UMMOwiki concepts

  • WOA (The generating principle)
  • BUAWE BIAEI / BBUAAWAA BIAAEI (Collective spirit/network)
  • AAIODI (Real entities)

Related UMMOwiki references

Related records